Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | pdgonzalez872's commentslogin

Sure!

- Here is a thread on ElixirForum: https://elixirforum.com/t/phoenix-liveview-in-production-exa... - Here is a neat little aggregator: https://liveviewdemos.com/, and here is the code for it: https://github.com/leandrocp/phoenix_live_view_collection


I had to wait 10s for that list to load :/


Blame api.twitter.com :)


got a copy. Look forward to it!


So how do I get to experiment with this in a controlled and legal way these days?


You don’t.

But if you have the drive, and are willing to take a small risk, you venture into the dark web and locate one of the handful of chemists/dealers who provide the world with its supply and buy in bulk.

Or you find a friend who has already done this work.


To bad all the good Darknets were taken down and replaced with Honeypots.


Source?


Thank you for the info



This isn't legal or controlled, but if you spend some time attending music festivals, you can come across just about and drug you would imagine (speaking about the US). LSD and mushrooms are popular at these shows. Speaking from experience, I would that if you have a personality that can handle finding drugs, then this would be less risky than buying from an online source.


I am curious about that too.


Go to New Mexico for ayahuasca or peyote based religious ceremonies?



Oops


Well something like this may exist in New Mexico as well, just that's the one I know of.


step one is realizing that if you want to expand your mind you have to reject the systems of control that dictate to you which thoughts and behaviors are allowed.

put differently: the barriers to experimentation with psychedelics are the ones that you have constructed for yourself.


Look into 1-PLSD


The pipe operator in Elixir.


fantastic question. Just because the software complied with the requirements at one point doesn't mean it will in the future.


True, but I'm thinking if you can tell it was written by people who know what they're doing, odds are the company will continue to have people who know what they're doing.


In this situation at least it’s a 5 person company so the flux that they’re going to have to go through both with people and tech is gonna be pretty large. If you’re trying to gauge the future you could probably do the same / better job figuring that information out by having technical deep dives and researching their key employees and their past track record. Personally the source code is not the way I would want to gauge that information in the first place anyways, it’s a logistical nightmare and overkill.

Also to be more helpful it’s not unreasonable to ask to speak with current customers, seek proof of claims on stuff like SLAs and uptime, etc. There’s literally a million ways people do this in the real world without obtaining source code.


Spoken languages are like that too. A 3 year old doesn't know what verbs are. They just speak.

Another interesting thing is how people forget their path to personal journey regarding learning. "I did `y`, but you should do `x` because now that I look back I should have done `x`." "But, but, you did `y`! "Yes, but `x` is the way to go."

You mentioned musical instruments: great topic. The very best musicians have always been around music, sometimes not even being able to read music. There is no clear path, the only clear thing about this is the time + effort regarding learning something well: just have to put in the time.


> Spoken languages are like that too. A 3 year old doesn't know what verbs are. They just speak.

Not sure how you meant this to be understood, but a 3 year old definitely knows that there are different word classes that behave differently. They don't know that they're called verbs, nouns, adjectives, etc. but they do correctly (to a large enough extent) use grammar applying specifically to the different word classes.


That's horrible. Sorry for your experience.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: