Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | randomgermanguy's commentslogin

Yes, but in practice land-ownership is only zero sum in places like Europe where every square-kilometer has 300 years of documented ownership etc, or other high-density areas.

The Asia, Africa & the Americas have so much unused space that isn't as inhospitable as central Australia


Where in Asia do you have in mind? A few things I know off hand. Sri Lanka has a higher population density than Britain, Japan's is much higher than that, and Java has nearly the population of Russia in an area smaller than England (just England, not Britain or the UK). India and China are big, but have huge populations.

There is lots of "unused space" in places like Alaska or Siberia or deserts or mountains, but land is not a fungible commodity. Unused space is unused for a reason. In practice, almost all ownership of land is a zero sum game.


I think the author might argue, that simply becoming more efficient at creating a rent-seeking mechanism is not beneficial. No matter how well motivated you are to improve your zero-sum game skills, it's still zero-sum.

Or something like that.


You can already buy A100/H100s on eBay. While it might not ever be economical to run these at home (cost of electricity), but it's plenty fun.

Cool idea, but kinda sad that it has to go through a cloud-provider. I feel like there's a possibility with an accelerator-board (Coral TPU or something), to make this into a totally local thing maybe? The longer-waiting time is surely not an issue when considering how many people still use Polaroids.


We were looking to add on-device styles with the Raspberry Pi in order to keep the device cost low, though a Coral TPU would make this easier. The OnyxStream library appears to be able to do SD1.5 generation in 10 minutes on a Pi Zero, so with some optimization and reducing image resolution img2img may be possible on the Pi in ~1 minute. We were also looking at style transfer models, which are much more lightweight and could run fast on a Pi (https://github.com/tyui592/AdaIN_Pytorch/tree/master). Eventually our goal is to make this both on-device and relatively cheap.


We were looking into OnnxStream (https://github.com/vitoplantamura/OnnxStream) and modifying it to support img2img. We got pretty close but yeah capability of running diffusion models on a Raspi are quite limited lol.

Alternatively we could use compute from your iPhone, but it adds additional dependencies to external hardware that I don't quite like. We could use a Jetson, but then power draw is quite high. I agree with you that on-device inference is the holy grail, but figuring out the best approach is something we are still trying to figure out.


why would I believe a random account with 1k followers ?


The fact that I have to give them an email for details just feels immediately like a B2B-scam.

Hope they can figure out software, but what im seeing isn't super-promising


I started using https://github.com/kushalpandya/Petrichor a while ago.

Though design is more akin to the default Apple Music app than WinAmp.


I've wanted a music player like the early versions of iTunes for a while, and this looks like it might fit the bill.

Those who've only known Music.app and later iTunes versions might be surprised to learn that there was a time when iTunes actually had a clean, intuitive UI: https://www.versionmuseum.com/history-of/itunes-app


Beautiful. I remember running iTunes 5 on my Powerbook G4, incredible how things have changed.


Interesting! Will be checking it out.


Always love seeing a new BMC talk


Made my eyes glaze over only slightly faster than trying to listen to the real Zizek.

Well done!


I guess the question is if it's like the crypto-bubble, where theres no real value left in the end (haven't heard of a good use for those ASICs). Or more like the dot-com bubble where fiber-cable installed is still valuable without pets.com around.

But since I wasn't really around for either of those ... ¯\_ (ツ)_/¯


I have no special knowledge but i lean towards more like dot com. AI occasionally does useful things, but nobody really knows what to do with it so people are trying everything and seeing what sticks. Eventually the money will dry up and a lot will fail. However i think chat-gpt-esque things are not going away (the fibre-cable in this metaphor).


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: