Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | rawling's commentslogin


Because it's transcluded in (into?) a lot of those cameras' pages.

"now"?

We've been doing this for years.

(Well, "which" at least per the headline, not "where from" per the body.)


Maybe some session sharing issue? Wouldn't show up if you weren't testing multiple users at the same time.

I enjoyed getting an instant rate limit screen trying to load that blob (and then the one linked from TFA).

I don't think I have anything on my network hammering GH...


Generally, if you're web browser isn't leaking loads of personally identifiable information, everything reacts like you're a bot.

I also get that screen on GitHub occasionally, so it's not just you.


But you can't, can you? Everything just goes into the context...

Easier to say when the source is your own material.


Neither the "before" nor "after" here have "small slimy"

https://www.ringgame.net/riddles.html


Yeah it's entirely possible the version that I have that is supposed to be from 1937 was tainted with later versions despite it not containing any of the more well known 1951 changes. That is maybe someone reconstructed it by taking a 1966 copy and undoing the changes, but forgot about the small slimy creature change.

But apparently there were dozens of different versions that actually ended up in print that had different amounts of the changes caused by some printers mixing old plates and new. So it's entirely possible that small slimy appeared in some versions around 1951 but not others and that's what that page is working off of.


What job are you in where you can even come up with problems that -need- 30-40k lines of code a day?


And how do you know they are nearly perfect?


The unit tests written by the LLM all pass!


When I asked it if the tests correct it responded absolutely yes sir !

The tests were so good they all passed before the code was fully finished and during huge refactoring they've never failed !


My 20k lines of unit tests say so?


Just because tests pass does not mean that they're testing the right thing to begin with. Reviewing tests is as important, if not even more important than reviewing code.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: