General aliases are bad imho because it tends (in my experience) to attract spam... One way I get around that, is instead of aliasing @domain.com, I do .a@domain.com, so I use my emails when i subscribe ServiceName.a@domain.com
If an All Hands meeting sounds borderline boring "All Employee" meetings sound worse than school on a weekend!! j/k but they definitely gone way to far at your company... i feel for you lol
A common model in some cost cutting software is to charge x% of the total savings... Win/win...just a suggestion... use picks "main LLM" and you calculate the "non optimized cost" based on that. Whatever savings you drive you take a share of the savings.
however, as janekm says, we can't charge just based on cost savings. We would need the router points to be sufficiently compelling wrt quality, speed and cost (including our own margins) that users still sometimes opt for these router points. Suffice it to say, if any router configs do start to take margins, then this will be clearly reflected in the overall router cost plotted on the scatter graph. UX will not be affected.
No, it's not just optimistic. Optimistic means you say - we are working on it, it's 3-5 years away, but we think we can make it.
Tesla and Musk, spent the past 10 years saying that many things they work on are <1 year away. For any sane person, that timeframe implies the product is ready, already tested and it's just a matter of figuring out the details.
I've recently spoke with somebody who absolutely believed Tesla is going to automate all their US manufacturing and fire all the workers, thanks to Optimus, beginning next year !
As others have said, the information wasn't something they'd need (arguably) to vet people, and even if it was, what is the argument to keeping all those people's personal data for more than a decade... They breached the confidentiality expected, and I'm not sure this can be just considered an "understandable mistake"... sorry, they need to be help to the same standards anyone possessing or processing data does.
isn't this pretty common to most analyses of past events and attempts to make proxy analyses for the future? If we had all of the facts organized and known we would be able to prevent all crashes, etc, would we not?
And apparently many people here on HN want to discredit the author's conclusions because they dont agree with them personally.
good balance for me...