The lack of the later leads to the former.

That’s not what that means.

ooh this reminds me of the old internet. Altavista, Yahoo, etc. all had lists like this!

It's fun to click about and go down the rabbit hole of things I might not normally see in my daily routine which is now mostly about avoiding the hellscape of the modern internet.

I think you sum up exactly why they will be found illegal.

Found to be illegal when? 3 decades after they've done their damage?

There's a case in process that'll likely resolve in the next two months. Quite a few companies have filed suite banking on getting their fees reimbursed.

In the current political climate nothing is certain - but this will likely come to a resolution in the near term.

Okay, so if they lose that case, Trump will just pass a new executive order that once again takes months to resolve.

The solution, of course, is to never vote R again, for any office.

You have to punish anyone supporting this insanity.

Just wanted to point out that this is the first instance of a correct spelling of "lose" I've seen on the Internet in the last three years.

You're loosing your mind Jimmy

And, if Treasury must refund to the companies that "paid" the tariffs, the companies will keep the refunds despite consumers' having actually carried the burden by paying higher prices and suffering attendant inflation. A win–win for the Epstein class!

Phew, good thing this regime is super into following the law and listening to courts.

>* I find it hard to justify the value of investing so much of my time perfecting the art of asking a machine to write what I could do perfectly well in less time than it takes to hone the prompt.*

This sums up my interactions with LLMs

This is correct if the prompt is single-use. It's wrong if the prompt becomes a reusable skill that fires correctly 200 times.

The problem isn't generation — it's unstructured generation. Prompting ad-hoc and hoping the output holds up. That fails, obviously.

200 skills later: skills are prose instructions matched by description, not slash commands. The thinking happens when you write the skill. The generation happens when you invoke it. That's composition, not improvisation. Plus drift detection that catches when a skill's behavior diverges from its intent.

Don't stop generating. Start composing.

>Imagine what would happen if the populace figured it's getting collectively shafted in a way others may not.

They already believe that and it’s used to keep us fighting each other.

“Software is eating the world” and “AI is eating software”

I left software about 10 years ago for this reason. I saw engineers being undervalued, management barriers to productivity and higher compensation possibilities for non-tech functions.

How do you feel about this in retrospect? Those observations sound heavily firm-dependent, but I would be interested in learning which non-tech functions offer higher compensation possibilities

Lemonade will have some actual claim data to support this already, not relying on the word of Tesla.

Looks like this is a freebie article in a permission marketing campaign designed to build engagement and then get you to use their services.