the past few years at memsql we have watched quietly as competitors have released numerous benchmarks. often one particular benchmark that coincidentally fits into a niche strength. often cleverly ignoring its weaknesses. often against an antiquated version of our software.
we are quite proud to be the only database company to produce such a varied array of impressive benchmark results. no niche benchmarks. no old versions. as close to the truth as it gets.
other databases in the mirror may be further behind than they appear
if you stored data on disk compressed in MemSQL's columnstore, you would use that 128 GB of RAM for query execution. on-disk data storage would not be limited. if that's not a productive system, then I must have imagined the whole data warehouse and data mart market
the past few years at memsql we have watched quietly as competitors have released numerous benchmarks. often one particular benchmark that coincidentally fits into a niche strength. often cleverly ignoring its weaknesses. often against an antiquated version of our software.
we are quite proud to be the only database company to produce such a varied array of impressive benchmark results. no niche benchmarks. no old versions. as close to the truth as it gets.
other databases in the mirror may be further behind than they appear