Playback is 100% handled by the device. The primary (and essentially only) benefit of H.264 is that almost every device in the entire world has an H.264 hardware decoder builtin to the chip, even extremely cheap devices.
AV1 hardware decoders are still rare so your device was probably resorting to software decoding, which is not ideal.
He's a director not a "in the trenches" researcher anymore. He's being paid for being a highly technical leader who enables and recruits researchers he employs to do great work, similar to Oppenheimer in a way.
On the other hand, I know someone from the UK who moved away and lived in places like Qatar and Oman for 20-30 years, keeping their UK citizenship and paying zero taxes to the UK (and extremely low taxes in the gulf countries).
Then they retired, returned to the UK, sent their kids to subsidized state universities (in the UK), receive free healthcare on the NHS, and receive state benefits for retirees.
They receive all of these state benefits and they paid almost no taxes to the UK government for most of their adult life. Is that fair?
If I don't do any of the dodgy parts of that story but move to another EU country with children they'll also get free school, Healthcare and so on. For this to be "fair" you'd need some global EU contribution scheme OR nobody can move.
it's not, but it's not the general case and also you realise this is the very opposite of the US: you get taxed when overseas (unless your a large corporation) and then get no benefits when returning because that would be communism.
That's a bit of an exaggeration, social security (state pension) and medicare (state healthcare for retirees) are not perfect but they're not terrible either.
If you were outside the U.S. for most of your working life, it’s unlikely you’d qualify for social security (requires 10 years of work paying into it).
> Unlike the UK, the US levies capital gains tax on proceeds from the sale of a main residence.
I understand why it can feel unfair but by definition this is not "double taxing". The gains on the house were not taxed by the UK which is why he had to pay US taxes.
To be fair to Nintendo, they're very much still in the former category of making good products every few years. The switch was originally released 7 years ago, which is ancient in the world of consumer electronics.
While I don't fully disagree, I think Nintendo is slowly heading in that direction. I hope I'm wrong, as they're my favorite console company, and I'd hate to see them stop innovating and instead just release a slightly-beefier Switch for the next 5 years
There’s 2 versions of the NES (plus two versions of the Famicom)
The SNES saw a smaller version released later
The Gameboy saw Pocket, Light, Color variants.
The GameBoy Advance had a flip model and a later variant with a better lit screen.
The Wii saw a few cost reduced models that lacked GameCube and WiFi.
The Wii U was released in two different versions with less storage on the white model.
The Switch has the Switch Lite and the newer OLED Switch.
The DS line had DS, DS Lite, DSi, 3DS, 2DS, 3DS XL, New 3DS, New 2DS and I think a New 3DS XL.
Plus they have partners who release console variants like the Sharp TV with built in console, the Sharp Famicom with built in disk drive, the GameCube that plays DVDs from Panasonic.
Nintendo releases a lot of versions of its systems.
Some of those devices you describe were different consoles and not just variants.
Gameboy color had games exclusive to it that wouldn't run in a gameboy, the DS/DSi/3ds were different consoles, even if few DSi exclusive games were released.
Not really. No airplane was ever grounded by the FAA since the 1970s, when they grounded the McDonnell Douglas DC-10.
Since the merger, the FAA has grounded both of Boeing's new planes (The 787 Dreamliner and the 737 Max).
Boeing's safety record is objectively declining. They are shipping out airplanes with safety issues that are being found "in production". This is why their planes are being grounded (something that never happened to Boeing pre-merger).
Number of groundings depends on the subjective judgement of FAA employees. It's not useful as an objective measure.
Christ, Boeing planes used to just spontaneously explode back in the 90s, and the only reason more people weren't killed was that two of the three had the good fortune to happen on the ground.
Modern airplanes should be compared to what is possible in modern times with modern safety standards. If you want an objective measure then compare the Boeing Max planes to their Airbus equivalent: the A320neo.
The A320 neo has had zero fatalities. This is an objective measure that Boeing should be compared against.
AFAIK there have also been zero manufacturing defects at the scale of missing bolts on a door panel.