I stumbled on this some time ago and saved it for when my kid grows up enough. It is a collection of a few thousands kid friendly videos. I think their curation is pretty good, but check it out for yourself.

https://thekidshouldseethis.com/

Thank you! There is nothing wrong with large libraries. But you are right, there is something very satisfactory in solving a problem in a few lines of code.

Thank you, you made my day!

Thanks for the tip! Does it make paper shiny and stiff?

This is awesome! I’ve seen it but forgot to bookmark it, thanks for sharing it again.

Sure, I think the hard part is creating hand drawn animation. If you can draw or generate it, the rest is fairly straight forward.

I have an idea for somewhat different flip animation, stay tuned :)

Actually that's my usual approach, but you should see the vector output from these. I tried doing it and than went back to cleaning up the raster images.

For me, pen plotting is a lot of fun. There is something so satisfying in bringing digital work to the physical world.

As for the text, I have it on my todo list to create a few single line fonts, for some time now. The obvious one is my own handwriting, ideally with some randomness built in. I would like others to be less conventional to sprinkle them in my drawings, or like you mentioned, to create some pieces that are text only.

That is correct. I use AxiDraw SE/A3 and I love it. One of the best purchases I ever made.

Honestly, I don't think that is a bug. All examples are quite dense and the thumb covers multiple steps on the track. Firefox then translates every click like you clicked directly on the track. The library doesn't interfere with it in any way, it is how Firefox works.

Sometimes it even goes two steps in this implementation. Given that a vanilla <input type="range"> never moves (manually tested in Edge, Firefox, Chrome, Safari now) the handle when clicking anywhere on the handle I would absolutely expect this implementation to work the same.