Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | stolencode's commentslogin

This looks and feels like "Verilog Lite."


I gave up sugar because of my poor tooth health. My taste preference also quickly changed. It's surprising how many American products have ridiculous amounts of sugar added to them, how difficult it is to find unadulterated products, and how little sweetener foods actually require to have their flavor perfectly enhanced.

The sweetest I can tolerate is the 1/4 tsp of raw honey I add to my oatmeal. There are very few restaurants I can eat at any more and most processed foods taste and smell horrible.


If you truly mean tolerate, then your sensitivity might be a bit in the extreme. I wouldn't expect anyone to be bothered by eating a bit of pure sugar or honey even if they prefer their food unsweetened.

But yes, a lot of food is excessively oversweetened (it's a cheap way to win kids and therefore long-term habits), and you become desensitized to anything you constantly taste and will notice differences when you stop.

However, everyone has different taste, both genetically and because of whatever else they eat and is more or less sensitive to, so there's no such thing as "flavor perfectly enhanced", only your own particular preference for a particular dish. Someone eating less sour or being genetically predisposed to bitter might violently disagree with your flavoring for example.


> because to me it tastes exactly the same

Mimi: "If you close your eyes."


Not everyone is a soda connoisseur like you. I get it, some people refuse to drink anything but the original cola. But not everyone is like that. Some of us have a reduced ability to distinguish differences in taste, myself included. To me, the diet and regular versions taste exactly the same, whether my eyes are open or shut.

This thread is not about the differences in the taste between the real cola and diet cola. Many many healthy people with no health problems have the diet version!


> Not everyone is a soda connoisseur like you

You need not be a connoisseur to notice that they're not _exactly_ the same.

> This thread is not about the differences in the taste between the real cola and diet cola.

Yea, my message, it's a quote from the musical "Rent." Was this whimsy worth your rudeness?


Sorry. That reference went totally over my head. My apologies!


> For example achieving 66.7% on the AIME 2024 dataset.

We worked _really_ hard, burned _tons_ of cash, and we're proud of our D- output. No wonder there are more papers published than actual work being done.


That corresponds to a 10/15, which is actually really good (median is around 6)

https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/AMC_historica...


Isn't the test taken only by students under the age of 12?

Meanwhile the model is trained on these specific types of problems, does not have an apparent time or resource limit, and does not have to take the test in a proctored environment.

It's D- work. Compared to a 12 year old, okay, maybe it's B+. Is this really the point you wanted to make?


This is a nonsense critique.

Modest results are worth publishing, as are bad results.


It's amazing that none of you even try to falsify you claims anymore. You can literally just put some of the code in a search engine and find the prior art example:

https://www.web-leb.com/en/code/2108

Your "AI tools" are just "copyright whitewashing machines."

These kinds of comments are really ignoring reality.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: