Given by the confusion in this thread and it being literally the first time I have ever read of heard of the acronym “OTAN”, I’d go with not-so-common knowledge :)
I told you what he's "peddling", ie his research focus. You just read the headlines. That's not smart, you have to read the articles. https://www.bitchute.com/video/IEmsdn8tf7Rc/
I was just daydreaming about this the other day and would definitely give the finished project a spin. Depending on what you need (I'm a Rails dev, so pretty ok with Ruby in general but probably of not much help on the system end) I'd be happy to support you.
I'm not sure that's the same problem. I think Parent means that beef from elsewhere arrives in Ireland, is processed there and becomes 'Irish beef', which is clearly a bit of a stretch of the truth.
It's the same in Europe with many types of olive oil - much of it is grown and extracted in Iberia, but then sent to Italy, etc, for processing, becoming 'Italian' olive oil..
Doesn't bother me though - my favourite olive oil comes from Spain...
Yeah I'm not disputing the general point that some people would do something like that. But the specific claim about a company called "100% Irish Beef" sounded a bit outlandish, so I googled it.
> I'm not sure that's the same problem. I think Parent means that beef from elsewhere arrives in Ireland, is processed there and becomes 'Irish beef', which is clearly a bit of a stretch of the truth.
The problem is that it isn't true - the 100% British & Irish beef is actually beef from Britain & Ireland. It's a myth that it's the company name.
English & Irish law on the country of origin of products is pretty strong and certinally does not allow processed beef from other countries to be labelled/marketed as British. Also a 5 minute google search shows this is just simply an urban legend.
Unless it's for charity, I don't know who'd hire someone like this over another remote worker in a less precarious and unstable situation. If it's for charity, there are more efficient ways to help people.
Like the other commenter said, I like the spirit. But I don't see it happening, I'm afraid.
Another self-taught programmer from Germany with no formal education to speak off, here. Job ads often pretend to require relevant degrees but companies will absolutely hire people without them. The "If this description doesn't fit you perfectly you should still apply" phrase they often put at the end of their ads isn't always just marketing speech.
"punch-resistant interior walls"
This one is always so funny to me. Coming from the EU, I don't even have a "punch the wall" reflex baked into me, at all. Punch the screen, throw my phone, sure, even though I don't do it.
From a former line of work, many US friends used to punch their walls from time to time. None of my EU friends ever even tried or came close to.
The knowledge box can be 100% wrong, I reported a case where the shown answer was taken from a pop-quiz site - but it wasn't the actual answer, just the first possible (and diametrically wrong) of multiples choices for a user to click on.
The problem here is, in professional poker, the long run might never come.
In online poker, every hand you play is tracked and can be analysed and people have "run bad" over hundreds of thousands of hands; more than a casino-player will ever see in their life at 20 hands per hour.
It should be dependent on your edge no? With tiny edge you can run bad way longer than you can with a big one. And in live-play you should be able to find a table with a huge edge.
You're basically the best player. You'll play maybe 20 hands an hour, live - most of which you'll instantly throw away and make $0. Let's say you play 50% of your hands like a (somehow winning) maniac. That's 10 hands an hour you might make money on. Even the best players' "won money in a hand they put money in" stat is way under 50% - lower, the higher %age of hands they decide play. So you'd expect get 4 winning hands per hour, or 40 hands a day if you have the stamina (and the bad opponents to play with!). Now, most of your winning hands will result in relatively small wins (your opponents also try to win and don't light money on fire) and guess what - the bigger wins and losses stem from the more volatile situations (e.g. going to showdown) where luck plays an even bigger role than in poker in general: It's totally normal to do everything correctly and having to root for a 32% outcome in a big hand.
That long run might never arrive for you, even though you're the best.
I'm not "against poker" by any means, I would not be where I am today without it. Live poker is a (nice) gamble though, not a job.
It kinda is common knowledge though, the French version is right on the official flag and displayed all the time.