Secure Boot can be leveraged to more securely boot anything you choose, but it does require some setup effort, so I get it if you choose to keep things simple (but less secure).
Also most microplastics in the environment are from rubber tires grinding away on road surfaces so the food packaging stuff is a little forest for the trees imo.
no, it doesn't. no, i don't have any evidence it doesn't. if you go looking for evidence that it does, though, you won't find any evidence for that, either
oh, sure, they can produce microplastics after you take the food out. but you aren't going to get plastic dust in your lettuce
the most common plastics used in packaging are pet, polypropylene, and polyethylene, which have exceptional elongation at break. when you scratch them, you don't produce microplastics; you produce a burr on the surface
that's a good point about the tap water, and you're probably right about polystyrene yogurt cups and tupperware, though i still think you won't find any evidence of it unless you do the experiment yourself
Yeah but a screenshot is an explicit action by the user where they have the opportunity to curate what is captured. That is not the case when it's just going on in the background.
What about Window's built in "Capture last 5 minutes" screen recording, as a part of their gaming features? Or the same feature that's just enabled from the nvidia drivers?
Also an explicit action. Look, most people don’t know anything about computers. If it says use recommended settings, they will go for it. Even an explanatory first-install screen with “consent” is just jumbo jumbo to regular folks. It’s not comparable to installing custom software or enabling a feature from the settings. It’s incredibly irresponsible.
Even so, such invasive features need to renew consent and/or periodically alert users. The risks with someone else enabling them to spy are too high.