Is there a paper explaining it in more detail? I also saw on his website he has a similar algorithm for audio compression...

The examples unsolved by high compute o3 look a lot like the raven progressive matrix tests used in IQ tests.

When their smart young people leave to earn more money abroad, wouldn't it make sense to take smart young people from other countries that aren't that materialistic? Just asking for a friend...

I was always fascinated by siberia. Pretty sad that visiting it will be off the table for many years now.

It's relatively safe for foreigners to visit Russia at the moment. Just stay away from military objects and rare public protests, and don't do generally stupid things, like praising Ukraine in a restaurant full of people (you may get both support and a visit by police). You will also need a lot of cash.

That does not sound safe at all, it's irresponsible of you to suggest such a thing, imo.

IDK. The results of the US election could change this, too.

From my experience with a lot of hilarious SQL stuff I have seen in the wild.

It would be a good start to read the paper of codd and trying to understand what the relational model is. It's only 11 pages long and doing that would reduce the suffering in this world.

you mean this paper? https://www.seas.upenn.edu/~zives/03f/cis550/codd.pdf

Yes.

It depends on so many things, but in a climate where someones income depends on the performance it is easy to understand they behave defensive.

As a counter example I worked for a small company where the owner is a very good software engineer. I knew that he knew that I know what I'm doing.

So we could freely talk about problems without the toxicity that often comes with it.

It's quite old but german philosopher Schopenhauer wrote about it in "The art of being right"

He talks about dirty tricks to win an argument regardless of the content

You can easily see that behavior in politics

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Art_of_Being_Right

Number 14 is “Claim Victory Despite Defeat” - coincidentally, there was a lot of “14/88” being thrown around in recent weeks in USA politics.

And a metric shit-ton more than that thrown around in 2020.

He was at 1900 feet and could not be sure in which direction the plane was going.

If the plane would fly towards the ground with mach 1 it would have hit it in 1.5 seconds.

> The investigation report said the F-35′s transponder failed as a result of the electrical malfunction

Reading the article before posting comments could help.

But it doesn't proof that it was possible for the pilot to know this.

Which is why he still has the job as a pilot. He followed an overly broad procedure so wasn't derelict in his duties but ejecting from a flyable plane was considered a mistake. He was a squadron commander so the expectation of assessing a situation even under pressure and with limited information is a lot stronger.