A bit of a sidenote but: what is a gmail alternative that really works? For instance, spam handling is worse in pretty much any alternative I've tried.
I'm interested in EU-based products first. But they need to handle spam well!
It's hard to judge but for me Fastmail seems to be pretty great at detecting spam, at least it always ends up in my Spam folder. False positives are pretty regular, so far never actual human written emails though, only newsletters, but still. Overall for me a set and happily forget kind of service. Support is decent too.
I'm a happy user of Fastmail. It's a paid service (€5 per month) but that comes with higher standards. The webmail has been pretty good. Barely any spam to speak of (once a week?), even though I have various email addresses in public places.
Protonmail works in the sense that I can receive and send emails, it's always up when I need it. I don't know how much of the spam is not arriving or being filtered.
Do you have any deliverability issues when sending mails? I find Protonmail interesting and I like the clean UI, but I worry my mails may end up in recipients' spam folder more often.
I use Apple's hosted domain service, which is included in the price of Apple One we were already paying for. It's been surprisingly great since I switched my domains to it.
Overall, it's not widely used nor pushed (blue green deployments are now very common), but it still has interesting uses.
For instance, very high availability without blue-green (using a front-end that can be hot-patched), or... musical endeavors (such as live reloading code that generates music, on the go) https://youtu.be/_VgcUatTilU?si=DDfe4FN3Nw9OzRhF&t=122
Yeah, I'll use Tuta if I want an email service that I can't use IMAP with, and then I still have to find a replacement for the 95% of other services Google Workplace offers.
It is worth a fair bit. If you control the mirroring you can ensure the malware is flagged but not deleted, so forensics can assess how much damage has been done or would have been done, for instance.
One possibility for production use (in case there is a big value) is to split the nodes into one "front" node which requires strong uptime, and a "worker" node which is designed to support rare crashes gracefully, in a way that does not impact the front.
Another move that seems at a glance to foster innovation, not remove it. Just like having a common standard like PCI helped innovation in desktop computers, making sure companies use a standard charging connection could have the same effect.
> I’ve spent some time understanding how to do hot code reloading with releases built using mix release, and here I’d like to detail the steps needed, in hopes that it will help someone.
I'm interested in EU-based products first. But they need to handle spam well!
reply