"can't deal with the isolating nature" sounds like other people do feel a different need/reason to socialise no? People can pretend to socialise for one reason when really it's another, but people need to be interested in meeting this third need at least occasionally for the pretense to be worth trying.

Kind of, but most human relationships are somewhat regulated (marriage, parenthood, etc) so everyone has a framework on what to expect, do's and dont's.

Friendship is when everyone comes with a random set of expectations, all of them differing from person to person, and get disappointed when it doesn't translates to reality.

So you just don't grow friendships with people with incompatible expectations. It's not that complicated.

Not just for the LLMs

True, any neural network. This is a very grey area and rushing to call it "property" ignores what the technology is emulating.

Seems copyright works in part because of the effort involved in producing something that's similar to something else. You can't just copy and it takes effort to make something different enough, that gives the original a bit of a "moat".

If you take away enough of that effort, the investment in new stuff becomes unviable, perhaps.

Agree. I think the 'effort' reduction is the real difference that makes AI products different from human products.

Though this seems different issue from copywrite .

Like, we see that this can impact society, so we need some new laws to guard this.

Expect this to debate to come back with the growth of cloud-based IDEs

Think you're agreeing without realising

Damn... I read "substanceless" and "substantial" ugh.

The hard tutorial/real game divide has another disadvantage, sometimes I forget mechanics straight away and spend the rest of the game (until I get bored/stuck) overusing the one I remember

There has been a few games I couldn't even finish the tutorial because it was so boring. Didn't matter if I learned or retained anything because I never touched the game again.

Depending on the situation it can be risky to start thinking like this, trying to fix stuff with lots of stress, in secret, maybe working around access restrictions, it's easy to make further mistakes

People have been murdering, stealing, etc since people have existed, doesn't mean we should just shrug our shoulders

They could be gambling on us not enforcing it (having shown signs that we think it's excessive). But others have said this is more about the Digital Markets Act.

*I get a GDPR-looking privacy popup on Threads in the UK so I'm inclined to agree

They could be gambling on us not enforcing it (having shown signs that we think it's excessive). But others have said this is more about the Digital Markets Act.