occasionally I like to view the internet through a translating service. It's fascinating how different the world becomes outside Western European languages.

Try it.

I didn't cheer. I don't cheer unless the videos are snuff (a beheading) or pornographic (not in ISIS' case).

For the later I wouldn't even erase such content from the internet. All I demand is a proper age verification system for viewers and the actors. More guarantees that the actresses aren't, in fact, being abused by their situation would be nice - what can I say, I dare to dream.

So you agree that there should be restrictions on speech that negatively impacts public health then. You just disagree on where the line should be drawn.

Do you routinely analyze and challenge your own biases? Do you ever wonder if someone you disagree with might be right?

It's easy to call someone stupid while ignoring what they are saying. It's hard to charitably hear someone's argument. I'm certainly at fault there.

Either way I categorically reject the worldview where a "benign" paternalism protects us from ourselves.

> Either way I categorically reject the worldview where a "benign" paternalism protects us from ourselves.

That's nice. unfortunately the world as it is is categorically providing practical counterexamples to this.