This - gog - yes. But I think it is different than GAM which is an admin tool. reply

I think it is unrelated.

I felt that way too, until I noticed how different their schemes are for discovering these files, e.g. Claude will pick up context files in parent folders, and Codex doesn’t.

Maybe it’s better that they maintain different names to prevent people from assuming that they work the same

I think nanoclaw is actually designed to be run that way.

Yes, sprites looks great too – would certainly be interested in a comparison.

You are right, it is. But it would be a mistake for us to use this opportunity to attack them for it.

We should applaud their donation today, and at another time assess the meager contributions of many companies that should be shamed.

Every single financial institution on Wall Street, the City of London, Amsterdam, Tokyo, Dubai and so on, uses Python. Very few contribute.

I've worked at a few that use the 'mold' linker to dramatically reduce their build times. Again, very few contribute. In this particular case, I managed to get one former employer to make a donation.

But the list goes on.

Short arms, deep pockets, as the saying goes.

It’s interesting to see everyone advocate for open source software with permissive licenses, then get mad when companies use them.

If python wants to require money for updates or for customers over $X in revenue, they can!

If companies don’t want to donate, they don’t have to just as python contributors don’t have to if they’re annoyed at how it’s used.

very easy way to make bank would be to support extended security updates for old versions of python

a couple of paid engineers could support every previous version essentially forever

Money has limited impact and has all sorts of drawbacks.

A more impactful change from firms might be to celebrate and reward community contributions of their own employees. This can establish a more productive culture than just money. If an engineering company is willing to donate money (yay!), perhaps consider making sure that employees are celebrated for contributions they make in a manner that is similar to how we currently celebrate monetary transactions.

For an example of the opposite, Google laid off their entire Python team, something that also made HN front page: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40171125

You can see a chat timestamp when it shows up as a search result.

I’m not suggesting this is sufficient, I’m just noting there is somewhere in the user interface that it is displayed.

Yes, that does sound good, but if someone wants an inexpensive laptop that is also “actually designed for Linux”, they should keep in mind Chromebooks. I don’t think of these as competitors to the framework, but as a lower end alternative that is usually overlooked.

So then one solution might be to buy a Chromebook, and put regular Linux on it? I don’t think the Chromebook are locked down.

Yes you can do that, I think there are also chroot options; its running a Linux kernel already.

edit: actually it looks like this era is coming to an end; Crouton was archived earlier this year. Probably it still works on older models: https://github.com/dnschneid/crouton

Yikes, Node.js did really badly. If this holds up, my take-away would be ...

If I want to use TypeScript for Functions, I should write to the v8 runtimes (Deno, Cloudflare, Supabase, etc) which are much faster due to being much more lightweight.