Depends on what you're targeting

- If it's a rough PR, you're looking for feedback on direction rather than nitpicks.

- If it's in a polished state, it's good to nitpick assuming you have a style guide you're intending to adhere to.

Perhaps this can be provided in the system prompt?

I don't think you can build a unified platform using anecdotes. That's why product research and product market fit is a thing. Not product customer fit. Unless you're willing to understand how to address your market segment's painpoints, you're just going to have a platform like jira that does nothing great but everyone somehow limps along with it.

you assume he cares about falling birthrates.

that's already happening? are you going to be funding your own vaccine research?

None of what you say is inherent in a public service.

The DMV often gets singled out as an inefficient system that is emblematic of the failure of public option, but I assure you as someone who's had to deal with a privatized version, you're not getting better service and in fact the fees are much more expensive without recourse or oversight.

The answer to a bad system is a good system. Adding a middleman who is only interested in extracting as much money as possible is rarely the improvement the consultants would have you believe.

Washington state has privatized much of the DMV, and it's much better then what I've experienced in other states.

I saw someone suggest in another post, if only one crawler was visiting and scraping and everyone else reused from that copy I think most websites would be ok with it. But the problem is every billionaire backed startup draining your resources with something similar to a DOS attack.

use anubis to throw up a POW challenge

Saw an actual PR that says "this was generated with claude, please review carefully". Since when did we stop taking responsibility for what is submitted?

Yes, let's use blanket statements to justify our preconceived notions. I'm not sure what the conclusion you're trying to push here -- feminism is about women having rights. Including the right to complain.

If you edit a comment after another community member has replied, please disclose it with an "EDIT: ..." statement at the end.

It's unfair to change the context of someone's reply after they've posted it, and confusing to other readers.

But didn't you just do exactly that by calling the parent's thoughts preconceived notions?

Edit: parent changed his/her comment after I posted my criticism. Originally it was much shorter and only wrote that the parent's comments are preconceived notions. No context, no nothing.

We really need a see history feature on HN

can't tax two people if only one is in the workforce.