Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | vasco's commentslogin

When parts of a market become dominated by one or few companies operating in a limited choice environment, consumers can't just opt to not use both Apple and Play store. You need to choose one in practice.

At this point the regulators should investigate what the barriers are to new entrants and if it's too costly and nobody has managed to cut in the last few years, establishing some rules is probably a good thing. This happens as industries mature and become critical, it happened in transportation (most bus, train companies), energy, water supply, trash, etc, depending on the country and market conditions.


What is funny is that I know plenty of great engineers that won't earn $4mil ever in their life. For that amount of money you could give 4 guys $1mil each to create an amazing resource and take care of it for the next 30 years. I wonder how much PwC will charge for ongoing hosting and maintenance.

That's crazy because I assumed they were obviously talking about Apple's first CEO.

For "Scott Apple" search string, Google agrees with me and the forstall guy is just a secondary mention.


For me he will always be “Scotty”. “Scott” at Apple will almost always imply Scott Forstall.

Figuring out which "json" to "emit" is the hard part.

In the simplest ways also, to "fix" the situation in Iran, potentially a war has to start.

To "fix" the situation in Palestine, a war has to stop.

That's inherently very different.


And Donald Trump and republicans in general already want to murderfuck Iran and always have, and don't need or want my support to justify such an act, and already bombed Iran once this admin.

I don't support all that 100% but it's not like I have any advice on the matter. I certainly don't have better ideas of where to bomb Iran or how to help a populace 8000 miles away rise against their oppressors.


[flagged]


Any possible response to this comment would either be full of lies or an extreme violation of site rules. Well done, nice trap.

Thanks for your service.

Because under the guise of protecting children you now require the ID of everyone. And the service list will expand. Can't wait to have to swipe my ID to even start Chrome.

Switzerland created a digital ID platform (see also https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45407657), that has been open sourced, and that would allow people to prove for example their age without revealing any other personal details. It's maybe not the perfect solution, but I find this highly preferable to sharing my ID with some social media platform.

I can create an open source project that's very safe too. But where is my assurance thats what runs in the backend? All I know is what I'm sending. I have no guarantee of anything else?

It's the exact same problem with adding software the voting process.


So I guess in 10 or so years whoever doesn't submit their ID card to every online service in existence will not be able to do much of anything online.

Yeah, I for one am getting pissed already about having legitimate parts of the internet cut off unless I'm willing to submit to ID verification.

For example, discussions about recent killings by ICE in the US. This example is one where I really don't want to tie my real life ID to my online presence for fear of retribution if I ever feel confident to travel to there again.


So many platforms required you to register and confirm your age via face and ID scans in order to see any of the direct footage from recent events.

It will just go underground. Maybe that will make it fun again.

I'm not using any social media besides reddit (if it can even be considered a social media) and I have absolutely 0 problem going through life. What are you talking about ?

You're using it right now.

Yeah but after social media it will be "every site with user generated content" and later will be "any site that isn't verified" then its just a non neutral internet anymore. ID verification is inherently not aligned with net neutrality.

Funny thing is, too, that you can do age verification with zero knowledge proofs. No ID needed -- in principle.

Yet in practice, yeah, it'll be the death of anonymity. To allow ZKPs to take off would be letting a good panic go to waste, right? /s

While I believe the genesis of this age limit push is a good old fashioned moral panic, it's also obvious that the usual enemies of free speech are salivating at using this panic as a pretext to ban anonymity on the internet.


Then you hide them somewhere inside and go back out and in again

OR, you just have one or more accomplices ;-)

> People above you have limited time to focus on your specific issues. You can’t info dump on them. If they take a misguided action based on what you tell them, it will be your fault

This bit is useful to everyone, and many people never learn it and get jaded about work itself! They paint themselves into a dilbert strip without realizing. And then of course there's also bad bosses, but any work advice is like relationship advice, it really depends on the specific people involved.


It's a beautiful thing when you can designate any male carrying objects in their hands as terrorists and get license to kill him and his human shields (guy went home).

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: