No if you do a Phd at CERN or similar tier 1 institutions the pay there is often very low I found that for starting work at a world leading RnD organisation.
You mean because the show is about them? In the scheme of things they seem to be basically rank-and-file detectives.
All the science/tech stuff they do tends to make me cringe. A hair from a nearly-extinct field mouse found in just one park? whatever. I guess that beats big "revelations" you can see coming a mile away.
Its well known that family companies have difficulty lasting more than three generations exceptions Like Bacardi and Charles Wells are rare.
Also based on my Uncles experience the family Bookkie business (Birmingham UK) did not last to the 3rd Gen - ok the transition to legalization wasn't handled well by generation 2.
As you say your getting a much better tax advantage and can use capital Gains to reduce the tax rate.
Though compared to the US the UK has much better treatment of "employee" share schemes. The most common Sharesave is effectively a risk free investment at a 20% discount.
I am surprised if the Google union hasn't got fairer treatment of stock options on its agenda and I do mean for all employees.
> As you say your getting a much better tax advantage and can use capital Gains to reduce the tax rate.
This isn't true. RSUs are taxed as income at vest time, so if you're granted 100K in RSUs in 2020, and they vest in 2023, come 2023, if the stock has increased 25% to 125K, you'll be taxed on 125K of income. No capital gains involved anywhere.
HMRC Approved schemes only from Share Save through EMI (the gold standard)
If you get RSU's in an American parent company your screwed its just income there's some calculations on the relevant redit r/UKPersonalFinance - basically its treated income and you also don't get the legal protections
I don't see why it's misleading to call ads that are deliberately designed to look like legitimate search results (and which are themselves explicitly designed to misinform and misdirect) "fake". You can call it "spin" if you want to. But I don't see how you call it misleading.
Allowing your biases doesn't help actual debate on the complex issues.
As if the companies that place these ads are interested in "debate".