Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | wolfendin's comments login

The way this article is written feels very selfish with a distinct lack of empathy for how so called introverts might have felt in a similar position

Thing like this feel especially disingenuous

> Living a real, physical life outside the home is good because humans need friction. Convenience is alluring but it is dangerous, because getting used to it means forgetting that being alive isn’t meant to always be easy. We should run our errands in person and queue at the Post Office and eat in restaurants because it is good to remember that sometimes we have to wait around, or go to several shops because the first one didn’t have what we needed.

These are things I was able and am able to do without have to go to the office five days a week


That’s because nobody normal— anyone who isn’t a tech person— remembers IP addresses.

Hell I can’t get tech people I work with to give me their public IP.


Maybe young people can’t, but older folks can easily store phone numbers in their brains, so IP4 is easy.


Because the fields are there for humans, in the packet itself it’s a 32bit integer, and you can’t just arbitrarily make the src/dest fields in the packet bigger— it stops being IPv4 then.


I'm pretty sure the person you're replying to is saying that IPv6, should be IPv4 but longer, which is not at all an uncommon opinion, even if it's a breaking change to the IP protocol. And I'd argue there would've been incredibly strong benefits and much wider adoption if they did this. Sure, you'd still need new networking gear and software support to handle it, but the change is relatively simple (and potentially more easily backwards compatible), especially compared to all of the baggage that came with IPv6.

It's a fact of life that working with networking that we'll have to work with IP addresses at some level. It's easy to tell someone, "hey try typing in 'ping 8.8.8.8' and tell me what you get".

The readability of IPv6 is, in my opinion, worse with repeated symbols and more characters to remember. The symbols that were chosen were also poorly thought out. Colons are used in networking a lot of times when you want to connect to a service on a particular port, so if you want to visit 2001:4860:4860::8888 in your browser, you have to enclose the address in square brackets.


> The symbols that were chosen were also poorly thought out.

The wackiest example I've seen of this is the `ipv6-literal.net` notation for Windows UNC paths: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20100915-00/?p=12...


They are also a lot more vulnerable to flooding which is also a major issue in a hurricane


In a hurricane, 90% of the damage is in distribution, the only thing that fixes it are boots on the ground


They would almost be writing it like that, if they were making statements without qualification.

But luckily they were not.


That really does say something about how unrealistic house prices are nowadays, doesn’t it?


it doesn't say anything about house prices IMHO,

simply put the cost of selling a home should not be linearly related to the cost of the house,

and especially should not be a fixed constant across the entire country


Handheld was never specified directly, just “stood with a” which can just mean “next to.”

The HP 5061 was introduced in 1964, why do you think a counter that can reference the frequency standard is not possible?

You might want to be more rigorous about reading specifications.


The HP 5061 is not a handheld stopwatch, at best it's a counter top luggable.

> why do you think a counter that can reference the frequency standard is not possible?

How on earth did you strawman my thinking to reach that bogus conclusion?

You might want to be more rigorous about reading comments and projecting.


It’s copyright. Not authorright.

The exclusive ability to copy is granted as a conceit.

The restriction only came about because publishers got mad.


> The Congress shall have Power…To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.

Sounds like Author's Rights to me.


It came about because archives wanted a de jure monopoly on top of their de facto monopoly.

US copyright law took a very different path though.


Back when I ran a nitter instance, I’d get emails about the GDPR.

I’d simply delete them, no problem.


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: