It's a very intriguing question. But yet we see examples of people with exceptional personal wealth, doing things and saying things that seem ... petty or at least beneath them in the financial context.
I think even billionaires want their causes to succeed, so even if it's a book that accounts for 1% of their wealth, they still want it to do well and will say and do things that help it to succeed.
Also, as AngrySkillzz pointed out, the "ideas" put forth in the book are more important to them (than the money earned) and they can indirectly benefit their business by having these ideas, or opinions take hold.
Is this "brand new" network substantively different from the one you launched last year? Looks to me like this is still based off of OVH's (oft never fully online) internal 1Tbps network + a lot of rented fiber or virtual-PoP over rented transit.
Is the bandwidth still part of the lackluster Volume network you use in your French DCs?
which gives white-hats the opportunity to patch your system without exploiting. The why I see it, a malicious person is going to exploit your server anyway. This way white-hats could patch your system and not be prosecuted. With this, someone who discovered the patch could scan the internet, look for servers that say "yes, please patch me" and deploy a quick patch and nothing else.
I don't foresee a lot of issues once a user gets the hang of it, and I am expecting each user to have approximately 10 websites which should eventually pay off. Hopefully it works out :) I will also increase the amount of documentation/videos which should reduce the support required.
Thanks :)
I didn't really do any research on that expectation, but from my personal experience many designers can host their clients' websites if they can get an inexpensive and reliable host, websrvr is trying to be that.
> The all-you-can-eat is capped (small print) at a "fair usage" of 25 Gb/month.
I can tell you that this is wrong, I've personally had months where I've used 100GB+ of data over 3G and had no problems (this is on a £15 top-up). I don't know if they throttle or not, I've never really noticed it.
> Tethering is disabled while roaming overseas on "feel at home", but not prevented at home.
I didn't get my handset from Three but I've been able to tether in Paris and used at least 2GB when I was there.
The limit only applies when roaming with Feel at Home (free roaming). Data is capped at 25GB, and I think calls are capped at 300 mins and texts at 3000, too.
When not roaming, there is no limit on data:
> "Does all you can eat data come with any limits? The limit is how much your device can consume – if you were to actively use data or the Internet on your phone every second, of every day, in every month (and we would be worried if you were !!!!) you would, subject to the current traffic management requirements (which vary from time to time), use up to 1000GB per month. So in essence there is a limit of how much data you can actually consume which is up to 1000GB. All this means that you can have absolute peace of mind and enjoy all the internet you need on your smartphone, without worrying."
It took a while to find the original, it's a PDF rather than a web page and it was plagiarized within days of being published, google picked up on the plagiarized copy before it ever saw the original by the looks of it.
I am not sure how you get from the PDF to the confirmation. The first page of the PDF says it is from “Infosec Institute” and “Darmawan Salihun”. If you want to show plagiarism, should you not be linking to a version that has the same contents but with different authors?
They are sold in parcels. There isn't like a list of debtors in default the bank maintains that you can go pick from. It's more like here's 1,287 loans defaulted on, worth a total of $4,342,230 that you can bid on.
Hi, thanks for the feedback. I've asked for credit card details to prevent the abuse of this service since you can scan any website.
However, I'm currently in the process of working with the Google Analytics API to provide free scans for verified websites where the user can prove ownership -- this should roll out in about a week or so. Would you like me to drop you a PM when I release this feature?
