Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | xchip's commentslogin

What is your body count now?

gmail sucks, I'm getting 2-3 spam emails a day, am I the only one?

I wouldn't know, I don't look at my spam folder.

Gmail spam filtering is poor enough that a lot of obvious spam reaches the inbox as well. The quality of the spam filter alone is a good enough reason to move off gmail.

I just mark as spam and move on. Maybe my email isn't on as many spam lists.

If you only get 2-3 you are lucky :)

I have almost zero spam (that isn't filtered properly). Once in a while I catch a false positive in the spam folder but that's about it.

Maybe 10 annually.

Note that now Youtube can claim they are not a monopoly and keep on steamrolling.


lmgtfy is a reasonable one, nobody should get offended for that


Yes cuz nobody ever thinks to search Google for something before asking.

excuse the passive aggressive form of this comment


"may be linked" indicates low certainity


In the 500AD the Delphi's oracle already had written at the entrance "Nothing too much", good we are rediscovering this again now


> Study finds growing social circles **may** fuel polarization

Note that this study MAY not be accurate


headline should be more precise


Because they are poor and you can easily bribe the politicians


Regardless of potential bribes to politicians, its easy to look at the increased yields from GMO foods as a benefit for a country where ~20% of the population are undernourished

https://www.globalhungerindex.org/nigeria.html


It is an artificial dichotomy tbh. When you say GMO foods, you usually refer to foods that have been introduced to populations across the globe in environments they are not suitable to be grown in. Yes GMO rice will probably grow better and feed more people in drought prone regions of India, but so would the indigenous millets that were replaced by rice. They require less water (and fertilizers and pesticides that GMOs require), are more resilient to climate events and more suitable to local climate. Not saying GMO foods are A solution, just that they aren’t the ONLY solution if the goal was to feed enough people.

Some additional reading: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10695985/#:~:text=A...


Behavior follows costs. There is probably some stumbling block regarding millets. That being said, seed companies are very interested in land races, do not be mistaken. They are a good source of phenotypic variation and potential traits that might be favorable to introduce into the elite cultivars.


You're making the fallacy that these people can afford greater quantities of more expensive food.


Did you read the article? I think this case study shows why gm is likely to be key to avoiding mass starvation as climate change becomes a bigger issue.


The government can't even make a dent into wars between farmers and livestock herders.

Any political control or statement on GMOs are largely theater. They have next to no means to prohibit it nor subsidize it.


How do we stop painters from drawing you naked?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: