Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | zavertnik's commentslogin

This was outside an immigration facility and not a result of the supposed doxing.


Oh so I guess that makes it okie dokie then. There’s no way these terrorists won’t start going after ICE agents and their families in their homes if they get doxxed. Don’t be so obtuse.


One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.


Why do people illegally in this country deserve to stay here? When you enter a country illegally or overstay your visa you should not act surprised when ICE agents facilitate your deportation. We have laws and processes to become a legal citizen and we cannot and should not just take in everyone who wants to come here.


> Why do people illegally in this country deserve to stay here?

Due process and all that.

This is what is the problem. And then there is the way the current administration uses this as effectively a way to terrorize the population rather than to simply enforce the law. It's just red meat for the base, and ineffective at that.

But: Don't forget to march in lockstep. And remember those jobs that were stolen when you can't afford your groceries anymore.


Same here. Easily one of the worst parts of AI in my personal life. They don't even know about en dashes :(


I completely agree with your sentiment. Its basically Right to Repair's cousin! Fortunately, there is still time!


Some context for those just learning about this:

Prior discussions: https://hn.algolia.com/?q=stop+killing+games

Official website: https://www.stopkillinggames.com


> It's tedious.

Worse, it's distracting.


Exactly. I think the more thoughtful responses are starting to bubble up to the top now, but when I first got here, essentially all the comments were of this form.


Sorry. It warrants investigation, as the overt and covert consensus from Washington is to smear China and drag us into a "Trade War" that might go into a hot war. We need to be critical at every step. Every instance of the consensus manufacturing machine needs to be called out.


If you start calling out things that are clearly not that then you start looking like a crazy person and lose credibility. We have a popular children's story about this called The Boy Who Cried Wolf.

Maybe take a few minutes to actually read the piece and look at what else the author has written before jumping to the conclusion that they're just part of Trump's propaganda machine.


It's not the "Boy Who Cried Wolf." It's pointing out a systematic anti-Sino campaign carried out by American-backed NGOs and, in this case, academic mercenaries.


I'm not even saying that you're wrong that such a thing exists, just that you're wrong to implicate Jonathan Haidt in that plot. And by seeing it everywhere—even where it's not—you are losing credibility when you go to point it out in places where it's real.

You clearly have not read anything that Haidt has written and you just ignore all of the comments pointing out that you're mistaken, so you just end up looking like a conspiracy theorist who refuses to even look at the actual evidence because you already know it's all a conspiracy. Looking unreasonable and irrational hurts your cause.


> It's hard not to see this as a continuation of the American corporate interests controlling the media their population consumes.

Do you find the natsec argument to be compelling considering:

> TikTok I think has the largest share of American's attention out of all the social media?


Yes. Copyright issues are handled in the way you'd expect. Take down requests outside of copyright are reviewed internally without guarantee of outcome.

https://help.archive.org/help/how-do-i-request-to-remove-som...


This is something I've wanted to do for a while! I wish Samsung still produced their 55" 8K displays-- 8k @ 55" gives you effectively the same PPI as a 27" 4K display. Maybe someday.


Cool project! This post also appears to be the second result on google when searching "vercel app" (as of +7 hours from your post), which I also found interesting.


I'm not aware of search engine, can you elaborate?


I have used SteerMouse for years after giving up on the dumpster fire that is Logitech's G-HUB for macOS for my G600, which has 12 side buttons + a the G-Shift button which when held acts a modifier for additional macros.

My issue with SteerMouse is that when creating chord macros, it forces the original macro to only work when depressed, rather than activating upon press.

I haven't been able to find a suitable replacement. Curious if anyone here on HN has worked around this in any way?


Hardware QA is sometimes hit and miss, but Roccat mice have a shift feature that is implemented in firmware. The same goes for their macros: their mouse emulates a keyboard at the hardware level. That way it Just Werks and you don't need some cringey gamer-themed spyware always running in the background just to make full use of it, like you do for many features with Logitech mice. My go-to atm is the Kone XP, which doesn't have as many side buttons as the Logitech G6xx mice. They do make an 'MMO mouse' with many many buttons like that called the 'Nyth'.

Unfortunately their configuration software hasn't supported macOS for a long time, but you can configure your device on a Windows VM via USB passthrough, which is what I do. Alternatively, there are also several reverse-engineered tools for configuring Roccat mice, including libratbag (and the older roccat-tools) for Linux and roccat-iokit for macOS, if you'd be interested in either choosing a model according to what's supported there or adding support for the Nyth.


I wasn't aware of Roccat! sounds like what I'm after, especially without the gamer aesthetics. The Roccat Nyth looks close to what I'm after, but I'm pretty married to my muscle memory with using 4x3 buttons (of which are all in use, in both layers).

Because it is possible with G-Hub, I was just curious if anyone knew what the gap is between SteerMouse's support and G-Hub's support for the seamless G-Shift/shift key experience. I don't know enough about hardware to make a guess.

I'm 100% fine with using a separate OS to config the mouse, since my layout is not app specific. Despite the button layout difference, this will definitely be the mouse I try out next.


> I wasn't aware of Roccat! sounds like what I'm after, especially without the gamer aesthetics. The Roccat Nyth looks close to what I'm after, but I'm pretty married to my muscle memory with using 4x3 buttons (of which are all in use, in both layers).

Oh the mouse will be a bit gamer-y. You'll only get to escape from the gamer-y software. :)

In seriousness, I love mine for 'productivity' (a more pleasant desktop experience).

> Because it is possible with G-Hub, I was just curious if anyone knew what the gap is between SteerMouse's support and G-Hub's support for the seamless G-Shift/shift key experience. I don't know enough about hardware to make a guess.

I also have a similar Logitech mouse, the wireless G602. I can't remember all of the details, but one of the things I wanted to do with it (I think bind a layer 2 button press to a key chord) is something I was told I couldn't do 'without G-Hub', and in particular its Lua scripting interface.

I'm mildly curious about the division of duties there, too, which presumably also explains the behavior you observed (SteerMouse has to reimplement something G-Hub normally takes care of, and they did it differently).


Can you explain more of what you mean there?


Haha, of course!

So when you click a button on the G600 (and most other mice with side buttons), the button fires when you press down, just like the Mouse 1 or Mouse 2 button. On the G600, there is a third click button to the right of the right click, which is called G-Shift. When pressed, all of the side buttons have secondary assignments. Since you have to hold G-Shift to access this other layer, the macros are often referred to as chords in mouse customization software like Steermouse, since it requires two buttons to fire.

To configure this, you need the G-Hub software, which is in a nightmarish state on macOS. To get around this, I use Steermouse. Steermouse lets me get around this, however with one trade off. If a side button has two assignments (one when pressed by itself, another when pressed with the G-Shift), then the button does not actually fire when its pressed, but instead fires when the button is depressed/let go of. I imagine this is just how Steermouse handles buttons which have more than one assignment.

I haven't found a suitable replacement that is as robust as steermouse. Its one of the first apps I install on my mac, but this is one killer feature that I've only found in the G-Hub app.


I believe the poster means that the macro operation is that of an astable multivibrator, whereas they would prefer that it be that of a one shot multivibrator.


Ah, got it. Yeah, I don't think there's a way to do that.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: