Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | znmead's commentslogin

Trust matters more when money is involved, as is the case here.

You are an internet power user, the masses are not. I agree with the "zero trust" model, but that is not how 99% of social platform users operate.

There is reciprocity of trust in this case, that is the point. A system where community members vouch for each other is much more efficient than a centralized authority.

People already want the checkmarks, this opens the possibilities for much more than that. For instance: I am a member of a 13-person club. We want to be able to display that on-chain. We issue badges to the members and it's done.

Another case: A business or university wants to verify their members as legitimate persons associated with that entity. This allows for that.


Nailed it... pay to play needs to go.


Absolutely, thank you.


When do ideas become content marketing?

Are decentralized verification and moderation not worthy discussion topics in today's fracturing social scene?


Why bottom-up approaches to moderation will outperform centrally-planned ones. - By Nader Al-Naji

Decentralized trust > Centralized trust

Discuss


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: