Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think the main reason I probably won't be getting an OnHub (for myself at least -- it might be perfect for my parents) is my love of tinkering and learning networking. I like that firmware like DD-WRT lets me poke around at the internals, and actually calls features by their standardized names instead of some made-up copyrighted marketing name.


I'm no DD-WRT fan: I find the interface is inconsistent and ugly. And the support forum is full of aggressive bofhs.


The interface is definitely not going to win any Awwwards. The feature set, though, is one you'd usually have to pay a considerable amount more to get directly from a router manufacturer.


The feature set, yes, but definitely not the interface.


> calls features by their standardized names instead of some made-up copyrighted marketing name

What standardized names did Google replace with made-up copyrighted marketing names?


I'm not talking about Google, just different manufacturers in general. I think the specific router I had helped configure before was a TP-LINK small business router, which may have contributed to the feature naming. I wanted to set up a server in a DMZ, but that feature was called something unexpected like "Virtual Server."


> it might be perfect for my parents

If it works as well as advertised, with as little fuss - this is absolutely the go-to Christmas gift for techies to get their parents/grandparents/uncles/etc. It's worth the price tag for me to get my family on a device that I don't have to fiddle with every time I visit.


As opposed to made up non copyrighted names? What kind of silliness is that statement?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: