Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Also, it seems like a BuzzFeed clone, which Redditors despise.

Primarily because Buzzfeed just copy-pastes content from Reddit with minimal credit. Upvoted at least looks to be providing genuinely improved-upon content with strong attribution linkage. To me, it gets rid of a lot of the scuzzy-ness associated with Buzzfeed, so I'm all for it.




It tastes pretty bland and artificial to me. For example, this [1] post is fluffy in the most aesthetically offensive, buzzfeedy way:

* It doesn't link back to Reddit

* There's no context

* It's glib, impersonal and bland

* It has an unnecessary illustration

* It adds nothing to the original content

Contrast this with what I presume is a comment from Tom Hanks about what his perfect sandwich is. That's meaningful.

[1] http://upvoted.com/2015/10/03/perfect-sandwich-tom-hanks-red...


Agreed. This is an 8-word tumblr post stretched out to be an entire "article" of content.

I honestly see no value added with any of the articles I looked at. Every single one could be replaced with links to reddit comments, maybe with some quotes of the reddit comments, and the images down at the bottom.

It's a little less sensationalist than Buzzfeed, and I'd rather look at this than Buzzfeed, but I really don't want to use either of them.


Yeah, definitely kudos for the attribution. That's great to see.

> Primarily because Buzzfeed just copy-pastes content from Reddit with minimal credit.

Well, Reddit itself operates the same way. By the time it gets to Buzzfeed it's already twice removed from the original source (and Buzzfeed REALLY should find and credit where it came from). Redditors constantly take content and rehost it on Imgur sans credit. I'd really love to see Reddit make an effort to incentivize users to credit the source. Some subreddits do, which is good, but I think the site as a whole should.

It always pains me to see someone's photo, art or comic get thousands of upvotes but no link or mention of who actually created the content. Sometimes the creator will see it posted on Reddit and post a comment, but it often gets buried.


Very much so, although I'd perhaps argue Twitter's worse in that regard, with endless "best photos about X" bots happily swiping photos (often scraped from Reddit, sometimes even other such bots), inserting advertising into their streams, and making quite significant money off photographers' work. With Reddit users, it's done without commercial gain.

(Speaking as one who's had their work lifted thusly, particularly this one, "Momentary": https://500px.com/photo/43052792/momentary-by-porsupah-ree. It hurts, especially when there's not even any attribution, let alone any attempt to offer or agree on some modest fee)


Thank you! It's a minor thing, but one of my favorite things about the product is this brilliant widget u/comeforthlazarus came up with -- every article (e.g., this one on suicide survivors[1]) has a widget on the left rail[2] that follows the reader to display the OP, subreddit, and link to it.

[1] http://upvoted.com/2015/10/03/survivors-of-suicide-spent-the...

[2] http://imgur.com/gGVdaHU




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: