I don't disagree with your rebuttal of GP's post, that said,
Google with Android Java have no else but themselves to blame.
That argument is equivalent to "well, you should just have not left your door unlocked". Just because Google could have used OpenJDK and thus avoid the lawsuit doesn't mean they should have to do so.
And Microsoft's case is completely different, as they did get a license from Sun, and preceded to deliberately violate it, with the intention (as we know from the internal emails and documents) of killing Java.
Google with Android Java have no else but themselves to blame.
That argument is equivalent to "well, you should just have not left your door unlocked". Just because Google could have used OpenJDK and thus avoid the lawsuit doesn't mean they should have to do so.
And Microsoft's case is completely different, as they did get a license from Sun, and preceded to deliberately violate it, with the intention (as we know from the internal emails and documents) of killing Java.