Sorry, I might misparsing your replay, but are you saying that std::chrono is ov... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		gpderetta on Feb 22, 2016 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Why C++ sucks (2016 edition) Sorry, I might misparsing your replay, but are you saying that std::chrono is overly strict? Or that because C++ (and its C heritage) has allowed unsafe implicit conversions in the past, it should continue doing it in the future?

masklinn on Feb 22, 2016 [–]

Just that it feels strange to see safe defaults/interfaces used to argue for C++, nothing more.

Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact