I "hear text" as I read, but I'm not sure how it would affect how I tried handling that paragraph. The "voice" is generally monotonic, but I do glance back to reference words (especially because I didn't notice this was markov text). When I read, I take in entire chunks of words at a time and automatically pull out interesting words for the voice to read. I'm not entirely sure if I can describe what the voice says, but I'll give it a shot after deconstructing the paragraph.
* "During winter" ok
* "and touring the humor" ok
* "poignant observation to Hobbes" ???
* glance back at "humor", then "touring" for more context, whatever
* "as if to created as an outside action" - I didn't even notice "as if to created" was nonsense
* glance back to "observation", "humor", "during" to reconcile this weird construct
* "you can be found him" segfault, brain realizes this is nonsense and refuses to try to parse anymore
* "for examples" one last chunk it seems like I was processing when my brain realized it was nonsense
What was passed on to the internal voice (maybe? the more I think about this the more it seems inaccurate, but that might just be garbage in garbage out. And the fact that I've read this about 5 times so far). :
"During winter, touring humor, poignant observation Hobbes, created outside action - you can be found him for" ... unsure ... "criticized is the thing through Saturday $DATE_HERE$. $PARENT$ first appeared newspaper chapeaux during nature is babysitter characters another"
I do think it's interesting that as I get more confused I start focusing on words that would have been filtered out but at the same time I lose my grasp on the big picture.
This is incredibly anecdotal, but I hope you gain some insight.
* "During winter" ok
* "and touring the humor" ok
* "poignant observation to Hobbes" ???
* glance back at "humor", then "touring" for more context, whatever
* "as if to created as an outside action" - I didn't even notice "as if to created" was nonsense
* glance back to "observation", "humor", "during" to reconcile this weird construct
* "you can be found him" segfault, brain realizes this is nonsense and refuses to try to parse anymore
* "for examples" one last chunk it seems like I was processing when my brain realized it was nonsense
What was passed on to the internal voice (maybe? the more I think about this the more it seems inaccurate, but that might just be garbage in garbage out. And the fact that I've read this about 5 times so far). : "During winter, touring humor, poignant observation Hobbes, created outside action - you can be found him for" ... unsure ... "criticized is the thing through Saturday $DATE_HERE$. $PARENT$ first appeared newspaper chapeaux during nature is babysitter characters another"
I do think it's interesting that as I get more confused I start focusing on words that would have been filtered out but at the same time I lose my grasp on the big picture.
This is incredibly anecdotal, but I hope you gain some insight.