So we have an app that tracks on an hourly basis the following: people who hire against the law, people who work against the law, people who don't withhold income tax on wages, and people who don't report income to the IRS. All in a beautifully supeanable electronic format.
Since the developers have been working on the app for three years, I'm sure that they've built in safeguards. One simple fix that comes to mind is to store all data locally, except for the database of abusive employers. If people want to contact lawyers to recover lost wages, all of the information in the app is kept private since attorney-client confidentiality kicks in. With something like that, there is no additional risk to using the app.
P.S. This is not a criticism of you or your comment, danielvf (I think that the point you brought up is valid). One thing that does bother me about Hacker News, though, is that the top comment is almost always a rejection of the innovation at hand. The hacker part of Hacker News should be about improving imperfect systems, not instinctively criticizing and rejecting them. I feel like HN would be a much more interesting site and much truer to its culture if every critical comment had to include a potential fix for the criticism. If someone can't come up with a potential fix to add, then they haven't done enough research to justify making the comment in the first place.
The "lead organizer who helped develop the app" is a Mexican immigrant and (former?) laborer, so hopefully they are at least more in touch with the needs of their market.
The flaws (or potential flaws) in a given system are almost always more interesting to discuss than the ways in which it has succeeded. Praises ring soft, criticism is fun to debate.
I agree that it can be interesting and useful to discuss flaws, but potential solutions are what make the discussion worthwhile. Saying "This will never work for X, Y, and Z reasons" creates a much less interesting debate than "This has flaw X, but I think it could be solved by this change. What do you think?"
It frequently appears that people react negatively on HN purely based on instinct, without doing any research. The response to Dropbox's launch is particularly illuminating:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8863 (I think that every Dropbox user can point out half a dozen ways it is better than FTP or a USB stick)
All of the criticism on the Dropbox post is addressable, but the discussion would have been a lot more interesting if the original commenters pointed out solutions themselves. That shifts the discussion from a feeling of "This will never work" to "Cool idea! Here's how you can make it better." The latter, and not the former, is important to the culture of HN.
You're right, it is important to remember to give credit.
But for many of the people here, getting something "right" is an explicit and fundamental part of what we do. It's a specific, on purpose focus. So it's natural (and good) that we'd think that way.
That's exactly my thought. It's like a submarine way to rat people out. You hook them on one pretext and then you can turn around and sell the data to the IRS so they can get the tax cheats and on the other hand sell data to ICE to get people who jump in front of the immigration line in trouble. Win win win, for them, lose for the cheaters, and the cheated.
Well they are getting away with not paying as the worker won't or can't complain. Now the worker will have his own leverage so will cancel out cheating.
Yeah I think it misses the core problem with day labor, which is that the victims of any such shenanigans are themselves unwilling to report it because they are breaking immigration and taxation laws. Reporting it -- via this app or otherwise -- can make them much worse off.
You are correct, it's not illegal, and it serves a very useful purpose, however it's highly correlated with not paying taxes on both sides, and with hiring people who cannot legally work.
Additionally, both the Apple App Store and Google Play Store have clauses against using apps that are intended to enable illegal activity. Their best hope to ensure it doesn't get taken down is to make it a web app.
It could not be used in court, though, and putting all immigrants in some of CIA's secret prisons (if the exists) would be even more expensive for the tax payer.
And I think the point was that this data is potentially one subpoena away from getting a list of illegal immigrants (who themselves would be very susceptible to exploitation).
This kind of idea crossed my mind a few years ago, but I thought smart phones and data plans were still out of the price range of day laborers. I was thinking along the lines of SMSing the license plate of any car driving up and getting back a rating via SMS. I also wondered about the blow back from "aiding illegals" in more conservative locales.
Someone should write the companion app to prevent wage theft from time clock workers. My understanding is that that problem dwarfs the theft from day laborers. The app would log GPS coordinates as a shadow time clock, and a back end that can ingest a time sheet and validate that the recorded times are correct.
When I worked retail back in college, after the store closed a manager would have to unlock the door to let you out of the store. Letting employees out was never a high priority, so you often had to wait a while.
Multiply that times 10-20 employees a night at ~1,000 stores and you've got a good chunk of change.
We had a similar thing with security checks, or 'last person in the store', or whatever.
Basically, people are deciding that they are willing to work for sub-minimum wage, and so they accept it.
Ultimately I just left.
I think the way to fix this is to give employees negotiating power. We shouldn't be in a situation where an employer only treats employees well because of fear of reprisal.
It's one of those things that sounds ridiculous when phrased one way but totally legitimate when phrased another for the same objective facts.
Ridiculous but true: "I'm locked in at work after I clock out and need to wait to be let out the front door."
Legitimate but true: "The front doors are locked after closing and the manager is finishing a task before unlocking it for me to go home."
Presumably there are still fire exits in the building so it's not necessarily a safety issue (or would be more of a safety issue if the front door was left unlocked while the employees clean up).
The problem stems not from being locked in the building, but in not being paid (usually overtime) for that time where your actions are dictated by your employer.
The employees likely wouldn't mind staying 3 hours after work while the manager does Whatever if they were getting paid overtime.
Assuming that there are appropriate emergency exits, and that you aren't delayed after you are clocked out, it's probably not. Fail the first assumption, it's a safety violation, fail the second and, at least in many jurisdictions, and it's a wage violation.
This is an easy weekend project with Twillio and anyone with basic knowledge of how to build an API. It's incredible what we can do with so little work.
Plenty of room to grow in this market also. This same app could facilitate getting paid. Or timekeeping for the folks hiring the day laborers.
When we think about SV perhaps going through a downturn, we must remember that there are still hundreds or thousands of opportunities to write apps to help the extremely poor and vulnerable. This is great territory for app-writers who have teams of 1,2, or 3 -- but it'd make no sense at all to pursue if you were an established startup with a ton of overhead.
The problem here is that the problem is exactly the same as any startup -- ideas don't mean a lot. By that I mean that most any idea I could come up has probably been tried before. The trick will be finding a developer who is deeply immersed in the culture of folks they're tying to help and can speak to them.
Anonymously identifying officials that asked you for a bribe. That'd be a great app.
Finding the nearest potable water.
Job search for unskilled workers.
Craigslist for illiterate people (add in geo-location instead of cities)
This is great. More apps to fight wage theft are needed. Geofence your workplace, and when you enter and leave, record that automatically. Compare with pay stubs. Report to labor law enforcement.[1]
Wage theft laws are becoming tougher. Some states allow triple damages. Some make it a crime. California has been sending employers to jail.[2][3]
I am already doing that even if it is just for my convenience (I work flexible hours and the monthly time report is compiled by the employee on a purely trust basis). I use an app called Moves (iOS) and once every ten days or so I just check in-out times from the pinpoint location that identifies my office.
What would disrupting Labor Ready look like? An app matching employers with employees?
App processes payments, right? Maybe some sort of escrow.
As for deterring wage theft, there's got to be some good strategies. Maybe both sides enter hours worked. If values match, the payment is processed. If not, the disagreement is escalated somehow.
Each sides could rate the other (up or down). Leading to mutually assured (ratings) destruction if either sides cheats/rats.
"As for deterring wage theft, there's got to be some good strategies. Maybe both sides enter hours worked. If values match, the payment is processed. If not, the disagreement is escalated somehow."
In a union shop, that's what happens. The worker files a grievance and it's settled or arbitrated. This happens all the time; it's no big deal.
In Germany, there are workers councils to which such problems can be brought.
In the US, the worker gets fired for raising the issue, and can then sue for damages, maybe getting paid years later.
Sounds like a great way to document illegal immigrants and employers who hire them. I'd be very concerned about this info falling into the wrong hands (or if I were of a different political affiliation, I'd be very glad).
The article unfortunately has no info on what if any measures are taken in the app to anonymize/potentially encrypt this info. I'd be highly skeptical, especially as the US government has no problem twisting the arms of companies to make them give up users' personal info.
Let's not forget one of the two presidential front runners is quite the outspoken critic of immigration. This could have real consequences if it isn't done right (otherwise I think it's a good idea).
I've often wondered about a blockchain based union for shared-economy workers. Some kind of verified, distributed way to restrict supply of labour and push prices and costs up in the worker's favour.
Looking forward to the hit pieces about how this is a tool for criminals, layabouts, and Mexicans to slander and sabotage upstanding American employers.
