Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Obama, our manipulating word artisan of a president yet again attempting to use strong language (i.e "fetishizing") to polarize our view.


Interesting choice too - there's clearly a demographic who go to the Folsom Street Fair who definitely don't have negative connotations to "fetishizing", and I suspect any porn site operator could give you some numbers that some people would not believe about the number of people for whom fetishes are a real thing.

I wonder if Obama and his speechwriters have research about how many people (and from which demographics) that phrase is going to be read in which ways? (I wonder if they've worked out that they've already lost the tech crowd on this issue, and there's a statistically significant crossover between the tech crowd and the people for whom fetishes are considered a positive thing?)


If they are not harnessing big data for writing speeches then the White House is less savvy than Netflix and House of Cards writer, Beau Willimon.


It's also (and not only) in Marx's vocabulary:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodity_fetishism


Was Obama using this term in a Marxist economics context?


It's a word from a democrat (thus a progressist) to people that defend privacy or freedom (so progressists too).

In that context, the word is pejorative and is related to marxism (more than freudism).

BTW I don't think Obama wrote his speech (according my knowledge of House of Cards :) ).


First he accused me of clinging to my guns, but since I didn't own any guns, I was OK with that.

Next he accused me of clinging to my religion, but since I was an atheist, I was like, meh, whatever.

Then he accused me of clinging to my smartphone, and oh, boy. It's on now, motherfucker.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: