There are already a large number of restrictions on the ownership of arms. Try to go and buy any true arms (military grade weapons) and see how far you get. The intended purpose of the second amendment was gutted long ago.
My question is why have the anti-gun lobby not gone after ammunition. So far I have not had one good response answering this question.
Because without ammunition there are no guns, without guns there is no second amendment. If you believe restricting "true arms" has been effective, why do you think it is necessary to restrict ammunition?
My question is why have the anti-gun lobby not gone after ammunition. So far I have not had one good response answering this question.