Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Well the reason light rail and subways are so good isn't because they're on rails, but because they get their own track. If you put a bus on its own street, suddenly they're not as bad anymore: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bus_rapid_transit


They're also good because of the commitment involved. You can build around a light rail or a subway stop, safe in the knowledge that it will still be there in ten or twenty years. You can't build around a bus route like that. Ironically, the high expense and lack of flexibility are features, not problems.


I agree that BRT (which I have a lot of experience with)[1][2][3] does make things a bit better. However, the successful BRT I have seen is always in very specialized circumstances, while the proposals I have seen for BRT in (for instance) San Francisco have been so full of weird compromises and bizarre edge cases that I am not optimistic they will make anything better.

[1] Hop/Skip/Jump buses in Boulder

[2] 16th street mall shuttle in Denver

[3] "VelociRFTA" BRT in Aspen/Basalt/Glenwood


Did they change the Skip? I used to take that and it was just a normal bus in the normal street as far as I recall.


Yet SF still manages to mess that up. The Geary/O'Farrell corridor gets its own lane for the buses, but the "rapid" ones stop every three blocks.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: