I wouldn't count on media preserving democracy. Especially in its current form.

Yeah, the current media is more interested in preserving the status quo and helping out those in power rather than holding them accountable. The complete lack of interest they have in things like government spying and surveillance is a good example of that.

Enough of the motte-and-bailey tactics. Saying 'No Media' therefore 'No Democracy' is incredibly disingenuous.

Doesn't make it false though.

To have democracy you need to have information that comes with some degree of ethics and accountability.

Blogs and random outlets ain't that.

What else do you have? Rando civilian blogs? The more serious ones are a form of news media, but they need to make a living like the more corporate ones.

I think out of all the threats to democracy in this world, Ad Blockers don't seem to be the most pressing.

I vote we should replace democracy with a combination of random sampling and standardized testing.

The unincumbered spread of ideas is essential for maintaining democracy.

The press' current business model isn't necessary however.