Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

On the other hand, denying them access to an affordable communication line to their families -- in an age when such services are cheaper than water,† for the general population -- is arguably cruel and unusual punishment.

And to the prisoners' families -- it's most especially cruel.

† Okay, the calls need monitoring, which increases the cost somewhat. But not by much, and not nearly in proportion to the rates they're currently being gouged for, in some states.



> Okay, the calls need monitoring

There is an honest question as to whether they do in all cases. How is listening to the phone calls of someone in prison for shoplifting or drunk driving not a complete waste of resources?


If it became known they weren't being listened to, they'd be paid by people who were being listened to to act as a communication line.


You don't tell them they aren't being listened to, you just don't bother listening to them. And maybe you do random sampling.

But what problem are you identifying that doesn't already exist via mob attorneys?


I was just acknowledging that the need may exist in the worst possible cases. For the greater sake of demolishing the (perceived) justifications that are touted for this largely wasteful, predatory and vindictive practice.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: