In your example -- assuming 20 different blogs/customers -- you'd be running 20 separate instances of MySQL (plus 20 nginx instances plus 20 php-fpm instances plus ...)?
Now, let me first say that I haven't come anywhere close to even touching containers and most of what I know about them came from this HN thread so please forgive me if I'm missing something...
I, personally, would rather only have a single MySQL instance -- or, in reality, say, a few of them (for redundancy) -- and just give each customer their own separate database on this single instance.
With regard to containerization, why is all of this duplication (and waste of resources?) seemingly preferred?
In my scenario, I want to provide a package for easy download and deployment. Each customer will indeed run their own mysql db, if they choose to self-host the containerised software.
I plan to offer a paid hosting service, where I'll rent bare metal in a data centre, onto which I'll install management and orchestration tools of my choosing.
An identical container for any environment is my ideal, since this will make maintenance, testing, development etc simpler. Consequently each customer hosted in my data centre will, in effect, get their own mysql instance.
This way the identical software in each container will be dumb, and expect an identical situation wherever it's installed.
Now, in reality, I may do something clever under the hood with all those mysql instances, I just haven't worked out what yet :)
Actually it will probably be Postgres, but I'll use whatever db is most suited.
So yes, some duplication and wasted disk space, but that's a trade off for simplified development, testing, support, debugging, backups, etc.
In this case, a single mysql instance with individual databases may indeed be the best approach. It'd be very easy to launch a mysql container and have each wordpress container talk to it. I use Rancher for orchestration, and it automatically assigns an addressable hostname to each container/service, so I'd just pass that to each wordpress container. Or you could expose a port and use a normal IP + port.
The duplication is preferred because you can take that stack and launch it on any machine with Docker with one command. Database and all. Usually that's great, but it'd be very inefficient in this case.
Now, let me first say that I haven't come anywhere close to even touching containers and most of what I know about them came from this HN thread so please forgive me if I'm missing something...
I, personally, would rather only have a single MySQL instance -- or, in reality, say, a few of them (for redundancy) -- and just give each customer their own separate database on this single instance.
With regard to containerization, why is all of this duplication (and waste of resources?) seemingly preferred?