Right, all the good use cases involve not actually using it - if you're immediat... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		lmm on Dec 22, 2016 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: A Git catastrophe cleaned up Right, all the good use cases involve not actually using it - if you're immediately committing then it would be better if it just became a commit.

reitanqild on Dec 22, 2016 [–]

I meant: I cherrypick from my changes and commit bugfixes and drive-by update of comments separately.

My bad. I shouldn't have used the word cherrypick there.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact