Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's interesting since I proposed using LLVM in place of inline assembly a while back. I got this counter point when I asked on ESR's blog:

http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2011-October/043724...

Any LLVM experts have thoughts on this or my original goal within the context of LLVM's current situation?



I'm the opposite of an LLVM expert, but I'm having a hard time seeing the relevance of that email. It's about how LLVM IR isn't cross platform, but inline assembly isn't either, right?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: