Mankind has been around for what - 40,000 years or so?
The figure piqued my interest. I doubt your argument weighs much on it (nor am I taking a position on it), but when are you measuring from? Some possibilities I thought of:
- 3 million years ago - Stone Age begins
- 1.8–0.2 million years ago - Homo sapiens sapiens emerges
The 40,000 years probably refers to "behaviorally-modern humans", which according to one theory appeared suddenly 50,000 - 60,000 years ago, and according to another theory developed slowly starting 2 million years ago and ended 50,000 years ago. The 50,000 year mark is generally accepted as the latest time when speech and language were developed, though that could have in fact happened earlier.
In order to classify what traits should be included in modern human behavior, it is necessary to define behaviors that are universal among living human groups. Some examples of these human universals are abstract thought, planning, trade, cooperative labor, body decoration, control and use of fire. Along with these traits, humans possess a heavy reliance on social learning.
...
Archaeological evidence of behavioral modernity are:
- burial
- fishing
- figurative art (cave paintings, petroglyphs, dendroglyphs, figurines)
- systematic use of pigment (such as ochre) and jewelry for decoration or self-ornamentation
- Using bone material for tools
- Transport of resources over long distances
- Blade technology
- Diversity, standardization, and regionally distinct artifacts
- Hearths
- Composite tools
Of particular interesting is how they show criteria like abstract thought and planning, which at first blush don't seem very amenable to leaving direct archeological evidence.
I think I was going from "earliest signs of civilization" (i.e. French or Australian cave art, and similarities).
I admit to being surprised by the number for Homo sapiens. I'd have to think it was closer to the 0.2 than the 1.8.
But even then, that'd make it worse.
Even at 13,000 BCE, we're still not doing so well. It can be argued that primitive man didn't have the ability to extract many resources, so it's not comparable, but I don't think that's the case. We shouldn't get a free pass because we have no history of "mass pillage of earthly resources" with which to compare.
The figure piqued my interest. I doubt your argument weighs much on it (nor am I taking a position on it), but when are you measuring from? Some possibilities I thought of:
- 3 million years ago - Stone Age begins
- 1.8–0.2 million years ago - Homo sapiens sapiens emerges
- 13,000 BCE - Animal domestication (pigs)
- 11,500 BCE - Agriculture (rice domestication)