Where I work we use Bitbucket for code reviews. Their code review setup works well for us. We especially enjoy the "like" button that Codebrag also seems to have. It doesn't seem like Codebrag is very much different from this though.
A big way to differentiate for me would be if you could create "groups" or "teams" of reviewers. Say we have three teams sharing a code base. We could create a group for each of those teams. Then when someone opens a review I add the groups I need to look at it instead of the individuals on those teams.
One question I would have too is what is a "commit" in Codebrag? Is it literally review commit-by-commit, or is it more like a Pull Request in Github/Bitbucket terms? If it's the latter, I would rename it to not make the terms confusing.
A big way to differentiate for me would be if you could create "groups" or "teams" of reviewers. Say we have three teams sharing a code base. We could create a group for each of those teams. Then when someone opens a review I add the groups I need to look at it instead of the individuals on those teams.
One question I would have too is what is a "commit" in Codebrag? Is it literally review commit-by-commit, or is it more like a Pull Request in Github/Bitbucket terms? If it's the latter, I would rename it to not make the terms confusing.