I think what he does is admirable, regardless of proselytism. Homeless people now can at least choose:
- not to get the laundry done
- not to talk to this guy while doing the laundry (I doubt he would force them to leave)
- to do the laundry while talking to this guy
What was the choice before?
Besides that, I agree that there's a problem with the policies, but at least advertising the good example may get him funding or even start new services like that (maybe even non-religious).
What was the choice before?
Besides that, I agree that there's a problem with the policies, but at least advertising the good example may get him funding or even start new services like that (maybe even non-religious).