Actual argument: "Is [AlphaGo] going to get us to full AI, in the sense of an artificial general intelligence, or AGI, machine? Not quite"
Conclusion: "the rapid advances of deep learning and the recent success of this kind of AI at games like Go"
So not only the article discusses something different from the headline, it directly contradicts the headline by calling AlphaGo a type of AI.
Bad journalism.
Actual argument: "Is [AlphaGo] going to get us to full AI, in the sense of an artificial general intelligence, or AGI, machine? Not quite"
Conclusion: "the rapid advances of deep learning and the recent success of this kind of AI at games like Go"
So not only the article discusses something different from the headline, it directly contradicts the headline by calling AlphaGo a type of AI.
Bad journalism.