AlphaGo is not AI in exactly the same way that Aldebaran robots are not robots. Seriously, what do those robots do? They are just one step above Disneyland's pre-programmed animatronics. If this dude wants me to take him seriously, he needs to show me a robot that solves a problem for somebody. Nao is just a waste of perfectly good servos. Or, alternatively, if he insists that Nao is a robot, then I think AlphaGo can be considered AI.
People have been saying "___ is not AI" since Claude Shannon built a robot mouse to solve a maze. Then Shannon's chess playing program was "not AI". Humbug.
> People have been saying "___ is not AI" since Claude Shannon built a robot mouse to solve a maze. Then Shannon's chess playing program was "not AI". Humbug.
AI researchers say this because they don't want the hype to lead investors putting money in the wrong places, which could cause another AI winter.
OpenAI is one example. Fortunately, that's a non-profit. If it were profit seeking and they had a large investment that went belly up, it might cause the industry to tank.
That bust will probably happen again in the future. The "scrooges" are just trying to forestall it.
People have been saying "___ is not AI" since Claude Shannon built a robot mouse to solve a maze. Then Shannon's chess playing program was "not AI". Humbug.