Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Neither do maths, physical laws, etc. I think it is wrong and dangerous to equal Human Rights, which are an ethical decision, to religious beliefs, which are cultural construct much closer to "fictional stories" for non-believers. This new trend in anti-humanism carried by Harari, who is read widely, or Peter Singer, is frightening.


Interesting, I interpreted it as human rights not having basis in physical science and therefore all the more important for individuals and society to champion. However I do see how the quote can be seen as equating human rights to cultural fiction of arguable merit, which I agree is dangerous.


By "wrong" do you mean "morally wrong", or "factually incorrect"?

If the latter, in what way are human rights not just a human invention? What metaphysical or transcendental status do they have, and how do we know?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: