> Since the study demonstrates that psychology is unreliable, I think it's something other than abuse.
Your comment is exactly my point though. I suspect that you see the number 30% and equate that with "bad".
However, if 30% is more reliable on average than our own personal heuristics, then doesn't it seems shortsighted to write off every bit of psychology research as "bad science"?
Your comment is exactly my point though. I suspect that you see the number 30% and equate that with "bad".
However, if 30% is more reliable on average than our own personal heuristics, then doesn't it seems shortsighted to write off every bit of psychology research as "bad science"?