Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's what natural gas is. So, in theory, yes.

The problem is that, as a gas, and as a gas that's emerging in an uncontrolled fashion across a large area which is poorly developed, far from infrastructure, and in many cases hostile to development.

Most natural gas is harvested from the same types of formations as those which form oil-bearing rock: a reservoir covered by some trapping (nonpermiable) formation, which releases gas only when tapped by a drill pipe. That is, the point of emission is very much a point.

The areas are also already being developed for oil, have access roads, labour, and infrastructure. As such, it's generally easier to capture and store the natural gas.

And even then, for much of early oil extraction, natural gas was flared off, because it was too difficult to capture, store, and transport it. Excess oil could be (and was) stored in impromptu open lakes formed by bulldozed earth. Gas requires airtight containers, and is far easier to manage when pressurised (300 atmospheres) or liquified (-162C).

Doing all of this in the Siberian tundra is a major challenge.

Flaring off the excess would be far more viable, and even that is a challenge.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: