Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The way I see it, chatbots should be there to save companies money on first line of support by reducing number of personnel to customer interactions.. Like answering the most frequent questions and only if bot cannot answer those questions then it will redirect to real human. Not as replacement for the UI as they're used today. Also bots should be part of your website/app and not be integrated into third party service like fcb messenger. And companies should constantly check and improve the bot to better respond to FAQs (so developing bot is actually never ending process).



Just like phone menus were meant to. Except they have become mostly universally loathed.

I can just imagine how much more annoying a "cute" pseudo-AI will be when I just want to get through to a human being.


let's say bot should be 90% confident that is still giving value to the customer. if not redirect to human.


If you really believe you've created a bot that your users want to use then put it to the test.

Advertise that they can get connected to a human by typing 'human' and see how popular it is. I would be impressed if a bot could get to 10%.

I don't think you need a confidence metric, the humans using the bot will be happy to signal to you that they're not receiving value.


I can only agree with that.


That's what I did for a client.

When a client sends an email it's parsed by an AI to find things that could be answered automatically (because the user can't be bothered to read the faq) it replies to the user.

It tells the user that it was answered automatically and ask him if it answers his question, if he says something negative it's forwarded to a human support




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: