The article mentions that too. But if one company had the money and wanted to do the pseudo-altruistic thinking of getting it working by just throwing money at it until someone came up with a breakthrough, Apple has the money to do that.
The article is right, they could make a fortune in sales after doing it, and since I'm sure there would be a patent chances are no other smart watch company would be able to make such a thing. I'm not sure that would make up for $2 billion in research (just to make up a number); but Apple can afford it.
I have to hand it to you for not even trying hard enough to read the parent's point about type 2 vs. type 1, and then linking to an article that mentions type 2 in the very first sentance.
Great, which still has nothing do with type 1 diabetes being caused by diet (or affluence). You can certainly manage weight gain or side effects in different ways, but the point still stands that Type 1 diabete is an auto-immune disease where the immune system attacks insulin producing cells in the pancreas. It is a very different disease than type 2 diabetes, where the pancreas still works, but the person has insulin resistance, and is the one people think of when they talk about diet and obesity leading to diabetes.
No amount of diet change is going to reverse the damage to the pancreas in Type 1 - it is not a "disease of affluence"
OK, so are you suggesting that a vegan diet or otherwise avoiding animal proteins will somehow prevent and/or cure juvenile diabetes then...
I give up, and suggest you learn to Google something more than just source to try to confirm (poorly!) your own biases about what diabetes is or isn't.
Also consider that tech like this has applications beyond just diabetics. Glucose could be correlated with caloric intake. Tech like this could be a step toward the Apple Watch actually monitoring how much you are eating passively.
I would put money on that being the reason why Apple is developing it; not to directly help diabetics, but to add fitness features to the Apple Watch.
This reminds me of a project that Texas Instruments was working on a number of years back. They invested in and helped fund the development of a wire that could work suspended in fluids.
The startup that invented it and was further developing it was doing the work to develop an optical implant that would allow the blind to see. TI didn't care about helping the blind re/gain their eye sight, they just cared about getting their hands on a wire that didn't short circuit in fluids.
> Apple Watch actually monitoring how much you are eating passively
This is a technology grail for me. I'm for calorie counting and there's no doubt that it's integral part of weight loss. But entering all my meals in forms. Blerg. I only ever do it for a few months at a time before throwing in the towel.
Have you ever heard of the HELO LX? You would find this an extremely interesting device. Wearable Technology with Life Sensing Sensors. Check out our 2 minute video at http://Farmer.Helo.Life
013a
This is fantastic. The Helo LX is a device already ahead of Apple's Engineers. You can find the Helo LX at http://Farmer.Helo.Life
look into who Antonio De Rosa is. In short, he is our chief designer and he was on that Apple iWatch team in 2010. We are ahead of Apple on this one. Those sensors exist today and guess who has them?! But this is great, Apple has a much bigger marketing budget than we do.
The article is right, they could make a fortune in sales after doing it, and since I'm sure there would be a patent chances are no other smart watch company would be able to make such a thing. I'm not sure that would make up for $2 billion in research (just to make up a number); but Apple can afford it.