Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Now I wonder, what happens if you add sound effect, to change pitch, tone, or widen the sound stage. What would do to the decoded image?

I think the 2.00 bits/ pixel result looks quite more "analog" with a film grain effect to me.




I'm kinda wondering if this post was because of that, because I found the link in question and posted it there. It's kinda neat to see a possible circuitous route that something comes somewhere else with.


So you were the person who posted that link ;)


Awesome, thanks!


I did this with Audacity to some bmp images. I got some interesting results. I just read in the bmp files as raw data and manipulated them that way.


I did similar a long time ago with zip compressed TIFs and JPGs. Added reverb and the results were really unusual: https://vimeo.com/105317804


I really wanted salad fingers to pop out of my screen.

Thanks for that.


Reminds me that one could (can?) pipe random data to /dev/dsp and get it interpreted as sound data. Heck, you could pipe a wav file and actually hear it.


Or pipe output of C oneliner: http://canonical.org/~kragen/bytebeat/


Audacity allows for raw data input ?


Yes, you have to import raw data.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: