> Doesn't what you're writing actually influence whether 100% coverage is a worthy goal or not?
Yes, absolutely.
> Suppose you're instead doing something very UX/UI driven. Why bother trying to cover that 100% with automated tests, when change is going to be driven by the whim and fancy of anyone who sits down in front of it?
It might make perfect sense from a business standpoint to have no tests at all.
Yes, absolutely.
> Suppose you're instead doing something very UX/UI driven. Why bother trying to cover that 100% with automated tests, when change is going to be driven by the whim and fancy of anyone who sits down in front of it?
It might make perfect sense from a business standpoint to have no tests at all.